Arbeit und Fairness – zum Gerechtigkeitsempfinden von Beschäftigten
Der Arbeitsmarkt unterscheidet sich von vielen anderen Märkten dadurch, dass die Akteure in ein Netz persönlicher Beziehungen eingebunden sind. Fairness, Vertrauen und Loyalität spielen eine wichtige Rolle. Unternehmen und Beschäftigte sind nicht nur "Homo Oeconomicus", sie lassen sich bei ihren Entscheidungen auch von Gerechtigkeitsvorstellungen leiten. Was aber als fair und gerecht empfunden wird, unterliegt vielfältigen Einflüssen. Dieses Themendossier erschließt die wichtigsten Aspekte der wissenschaftlichen Diskussion um Fairness, Gerechtigkeit, Markt und Moral auf dem Arbeitsmarkt.
Im Filter „Autorenschaft“ können Sie auf IAB-(Mit-)Autorenschaft eingrenzen.
-
Literaturhinweis
Gender differences in fairness evaluations of own earnings in 28 European countries (2023)
Zitatform
Adriaans, Jule & Matteo Targa (2023): Gender differences in fairness evaluations of own earnings in 28 European countries. In: European Societies, Jg. 25, H. 1, S. 107-131. DOI:10.1080/14616696.2022.2083651
Abstract
"Women tend to evaluate their own pay more favorably than men. Contented women are speculated to not seek higher wages, thus the ‘paradox of the contented female worker’ may contribute to persistent gender pay differences. We extend the literature on gender differences in pay evaluations by investigating fairness evaluations of own earnings and underlying conceptions of fair earnings, providing a closer link to potential subsequent wage demands than previous literature. Using European Social Survey (2018/2019) data, we find no evidence that women evaluate their own earnings more favorably than men. In 15 out of the 28 analyzed countries, women actually report more intense levels of perceived unfairness. Studying fair markups on unfair earnings, i.e. the relative distance between the earnings received and earnings considered fair, we find that women report the same, if not lower, fair markups compared to men in most countries; thus indicating limited potential for perceived unfairness as a driving force to reduce the gender pay gap in Europe." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Fairness of earnings in Europe: the consequences of unfair under- and overreward for life satisfaction (2023)
Zitatform
Adriaans, Jule (2023): Fairness of earnings in Europe: the consequences of unfair under- and overreward for life satisfaction. In: European Sociological Review, Jg. 39, H. 1, S. 118-131. DOI:10.1093/esr/jcac044
Abstract
"A large percentage of workers in Europe perceive their earnings to be unfairly low. Such perceptions of unfairness can have far-reaching consequences, ranging from low satisfaction to poor health. To gain insight into the conditions that can attenuate or amplify these adverse consequences, comparative research on the role of country contexts in shaping responses to perceived unfairness is needed. Furthermore, justice theory proposes that both types of perceived unfairness - underreward and overreward - cause distress, but evidence on overreward from representative survey data is scarce and laboratory studies have produced mixed results. Data from the European Social Survey (collected in 2018/2019) offer a means of addressing both of these gaps in the research. Studying the association between perceived fairness of personal earnings and life satisfaction in a cross-section of 29 European countries, I find that both underreward and overreward are associated with lower life satisfaction. This relationship is more pronounced in countries where the equity norm is strongly legitimized and weaker in countries where the trade union density is high." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
The Impact of Relative CEO Pay on Employee Productivity (2023)
Afzali, Aaron; Paulo Vieito, João; Oxelheim, Lars; Randøy, Trond;Zitatform
Afzali, Aaron, Lars Oxelheim, Trond Randøy & João Paulo Vieito (2023): The Impact of Relative CEO Pay on Employee Productivity. (IFN working paper / Research Institute of Industrial Economic 1458), Stockholm, 38 S.
Abstract
"In this study, we examine the relationship between within-firm pay inequality and employee productivity. We use hand-collected data on a sample of S&P 1500 companies from 2018-2022 and find a concave relationship between the relative CEO pay and employee productivity. Consistent with tournament theory, we show that the pay gap between the CEO and the Vice Presidents initially positively affects employee productivity. However, this positive effect only works up to a certain level, at which - as expressed by the CEO-employee pay ratio - employee discontent initiates a fall in firm-level productivity. We identify this tipping point as the point at which CEO pay exceeds the median worker's pay by a factor of 40. The average CEO-employee pay ratio in our sample is 193:1, suggesting that most firms could have avoided a fall in productivity by reducing their CEO-employee pay ratio. Our results remain robust after controlling for endogeneity. From a public policy perspective, our findings pave the way for corporate self-regulation of CEO pay to avoid politically imposed hard laws." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Fairness im Berufsleben: Die Bedeutsamkeit der Fairnessdimensionen für die Arbeitszufriedenheit und die Vermeidung von Burnout-Symptomen : Die Ergebnisse der Replikationsstudie vom Frühjahr 2023 (2023)
Bauer, Felix;Zitatform
Bauer, Felix (2023): Fairness im Berufsleben. Die Bedeutsamkeit der Fairnessdimensionen für die Arbeitszufriedenheit und die Vermeidung von Burnout-Symptomen : Die Ergebnisse der Replikationsstudie vom Frühjahr 2023. Frankfurt am Main, 20 S.
Abstract
"Wie bedeutsam sind Fairnessdimensionen für die Arbeitszufriedenheit und für die Vermeidung von Burnout-Symptomen? Das prüfte die FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie und Management (Nürnberg) unter Leitung von Dr. Felix Bauer. Grundlage der Studie bildete eine Untersuchung der iba – Internationale Berufsakademie und der berufundfamilie im Sommer 2022 zu der Bedeutsamkeit und Umsetzung von Fairnessaspekten aus Sicht von Erwerbstätigen. Für die Replikationsstudie wurden die Daten von 518 Personen ausgewertet, die vom 17.03 bis zum 25.04.2023 an der Online-Befragung teilnahmen. Gut 2/3 von ihnen waren weiblich und 88,2% gehörten der Altersgruppe der 18- bis 31-Jährigen an, also der Generation Y und Generation Z. Die Auswertung zeigt: Fairnessdimensionen haben einen starken Einfluss auf die Arbeitszufriedenheit. Und: Burn-out-Symptome werden deutlich schwächer, je mehr Fairness-Kriterien eingehalten werden. Je mehr Beschäftigte das Empfinden haben, dass Fairnessfaktoren bei ihrer Arbeit gegeben sind, umso zufriedener sind sie. Dabei spielen insbesondere Aspekte aus den Bereichen Information und Kommunikation sowie Führung eine Rolle: „ein respektvoller und wertschätzender Umgang der Vorgesetzten mit den Anliegen der Mitarbeitenden“, „ein konstruktiver Umgang mit Fehlern“, „eine wertschätzende und respektvolle Kommunikation auf Teamebene bzw. mit Kolleg*innen“, die Möglichkeit gegenseitig regelmäßig Feedback zu geben bzw. zu erhalten sowie dass Termine bzw. Teambesprechungen eingehalten werden." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)
-
Literaturhinweis
Do women evaluate their lower earnings still to be fair? Findings on the contented female worker paradox examining the role of occupational contexts in 27 European countries (2023)
Zitatform
Brüggemann, Ole & Thomas Hinz (2023): Do women evaluate their lower earnings still to be fair? Findings on the contented female worker paradox examining the role of occupational contexts in 27 European countries. In: European Sociological Review, Jg. 39, H. 6, S. 904-919. DOI:10.1093/esr/jcac073
Abstract
"It is still a puzzling question which gender inequalities in the labour market are perceived as fair and which are not – in the eye of the beholder. This study focuses on gender differences in the perceptions of the fairness of one’s own wage and the role of the occupational context individuals are embedded in. Based on data collected from 27 European countries as part of the 2018 European Social Survey (Round 9), our study contributes to the growing field of wage fairness perceptions by analysing the role of the occupational context (measured as the share of women and the gender pay gap in the respondent’s occupation), and how it moderates gender differences in fairness perceptions. Results indicate that – overall – female workers across Europe perceive their wages more often as unfairly “too low” than their male counterparts within the same country context and occupation, and that this gender gap is more pronounced in occupations with a high proportion of women and higher levels of gender inequality. We interpret these results as an indicator of growing awareness among women regarding the persisting “unfair” gendered wage distributions." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Notions of fair earnings for high-Status and low-status professions (2023)
Eder, Anja; Höllinger, Franz;Zitatform
Eder, Anja & Franz Höllinger (2023): Notions of fair earnings for high-Status and low-status professions. In: Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, Jg. 48, H. 1, S. 37-51. DOI:10.1017/S1474746421000518
Abstract
"In den heutigen europäischen Gesellschaften beruhen Vorstellungen von Lohngerechtigkeit einerseits auf dem meritokratischen Prinzip, demnach Menschen, die in ihrem Job mehr leisten, mehr verdienen sollten; andererseits sind diese Vorstellungen von historisch gewachsenen Ideen sozialer Gerechtigkeit geprägt, die sich von Land zu Land unterscheiden. Vor diesem Hintergrund untersuchen wir, welche Lohnunterschiede zwischen Berufen mit hohem Status (Manager*innen, Minister*innen, Mediziner*innen) und solchen mit niedrigem Status (Verkäufer*innen, ungelernte Arbeiter*innen) von der Bevölkerung in 14 west- und osteuropäischen Ländern als gerecht angesehen werden. Die Analysen beruhen auf Umfragedaten des International Social Survey Programme. Ein Vergleich der Ergebnisse für 2009 und 2019 zeigt auch, ob sich die Vorstellungen zur Lohngerechtigkeit zwischen den Berufsgruppen in einer Zeit zunehmender sozialer Ungleichheit und prekärer Arbeitsbedingungen verändert haben." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku, © Springer-Verlag)
-
Literaturhinweis
Faire Arbeit in der österreichischen Plattformökonomie? (2023)
Griesser, Markus; Vogel, Laura; Gruber-Risak, Martin; Herr, Benjamin; Plank, Leonhard;Zitatform
Griesser, Markus, Martin Gruber-Risak, Benjamin Herr, Leonhard Plank & Laura Vogel (2023): Faire Arbeit in der österreichischen Plattformökonomie? (Materialien zu Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 242), Wien, 94 S.
Abstract
"Die vorliegende Studie liefert eine branchenübergreifende Darstellung der ortsgebundenen Plattformarbeit in Österreich anhand einer Untersuchung von sechs Unternehmen aus vier unterschiedlichen Branchen (Essenslieferung, Lebensmittellieferung, Personentransport, Reinigungsarbeit). Sie entstand im Kontext des internationalen Fairwork-Netzwerks, das im Sinne der Aktionsforschung zur Verbesserung der Arbeitsbedingungen im Bereich der Plattformökonomie beitragen möchte. Dabei werden Unternehmen entlang von fünf Prinzipien (faire Bezahlung, faire Arbeitsbedingungen, faire Verträge, faire Management-Prozesse, faire Mitbestimmung) auf Basis eines multimethodischen Designs bewertet. Die Ergebnisse der Studie unterstreichen die große Heterogenität von ortsgebundener Plattformarbeit und verdeutlichen, dass die Auswirkungen für Beschäftigte stark von den gewählten Geschäftsmodellen der Unternehmen abhängen. Dabei schneiden jene Plattformen am besten ab, die geschäftliche Risiken und Verantwortung nicht einseitig auf Beschäftigte abschieben." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)
-
Literaturhinweis
Social Positions and Fairness Views on Inequality (2023)
Hvidberg, Kristoffer B.; Stantcheva, Stefanie; Kreiner, Claus T.;Zitatform
Hvidberg, Kristoffer B., Claus T. Kreiner & Stefanie Stantcheva (2023): Social Positions and Fairness Views on Inequality. In: The Review of Economic Studies, Jg. 90, H. 6, S. 3083-3118. DOI:10.1093/restud/rdad019
Abstract
"We link survey data on Danish people’s perceived income positions and fairness views on inequality within various reference groups to administrative records on their reference groups, income histories, and life events. People are, on average, well-informed about the income levels of their reference groups. Yet, lower-ranked respondents in all groups tend to overestimate their own position among others because they believe others’ incomes are lower than they actually are, whereas the opposite holds true for higher-ranked respondents. Misperceptions of positions in reference groups relate to proximity to other individuals, transparency norms, and visible signals of income. People view inequalities within their co-workers and education groups as significantly more unfair than overall inequality, yet underestimate inequality the most exactly within these groups. Views on the fairness of inequalities are strongly correlated with an individual’s current position, move with shocks like unemployment or promotions, and change when experimentally informing people about their actual positions. However, the higher perceived unfairness of income differences within co-workers and education groups stays unchanged. The theoretical framework shows that this can have important implications for redistribution policy." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Caring in the Gig Economy: A Relational Perspective of Decent Work (2023)
Zitatform
Khan, Maria Hameed, Jannine Williams, Penny Williams & Robyn Mayes (2023): Caring in the Gig Economy: A Relational Perspective of Decent Work. In: Work, Employment and Society online erschienen am 25.05.2023, S. 1-21. DOI:10.1177/09500170231173586
Abstract
"The rapidly expanding gig economy has been criticized for creating precarious and indecent working conditions. These critiques draw on decent work debates centred on employment classification, regulation and platform fairness, with less focus on the interactions between workers, platforms and clients, which are central to the experience of platform-mediated work. This article adopts a worker-centric relational perspective to explore decent work in the gig economy. Drawing on the experiences of workers in platform-mediated domestic care work, the insights from this study highlight the importance of social interactions and relationships, using an ethics of care lens, to elucidate how relational aspects shape workers? experiences. The findings reveal platform workers centre mutuality of interests, responsiveness and reciprocity, attentiveness and solidarity to maintain a balance of care (care-for-self and care-for-others) when negotiating platform-mediated care work. This article contributes relationality as a key dimension of decent work currently overlooked in studies exploring gig work arrangements." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Unfair inequality and growth (2023)
Zitatform
Marrero, Gustavo A. & Juan G. Rodríguez (2023): Unfair inequality and growth. In: The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Jg. 125, H. 4, S. 1056-1092. DOI:10.1111/sjoe.12531
Abstract
"Fighting against economic inequality is one fundamental social goal in the agendas of most governments. However, recent studies highlight that people actually prefer unequal societies, as they accept inequality generated by an individual's effort and wish to reduce only unfair inequality (generated by factors beyond an individual's control). This distinction might help to explain the fundamental unsolved question about whether inequality is good or bad for growth: unfair inequality (UI) could be growth-deterring, while fair inequality (FI) might be growth-enhancing. We derive a reduced-form growth equation from a stylized overlapping-generations model with human capital that includes FI, UI, and poverty. Then, using an instrumental variable approach, we show for alternative samples and inequality measures at the worldwide level that the estimated coefficient associated with UI is always negative, while the coefficient of total inequality increases when UI is included in the regression. Moreover, we find that poverty mediates this relationship because the higher the poverty rate, the smaller the impact of either type of inequality on growth." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, Published by arrangement with John Wiley & Sons) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Wage Structures, Fairness Perceptions, and Job Satisfaction: Evidence from Linked Employer-Employee Data (2023)
Zitatform
Mohrenweiser, Jens & Christian Pfeifer (2023): Wage Structures, Fairness Perceptions, and Job Satisfaction: Evidence from Linked Employer-Employee Data. In: Journal of happiness studies, Jg. 24, H. 7, S. 2291-2308. DOI:10.1007/s10902-023-00680-0
Abstract
"The paper investigates the impact of firms’ wage structures and workers’ wage fairness perceptions on workers’ well-being. For this purpose, worker and establishment surveys are linked with administrative social security data. Four variables are generated, using approximately half a million worker-year observations, that describe firms’ wage structures and workers’ positions within the wage structures: own absolute wages, internal reference wages within firms, external reference wages, and the wage dispersion in firms. The interrelations between these wage structure variables, workers’ perceived wage fairness, and job satisfaction are then analyzed using regressions. Interpersonal wage comparisons between co-workers in the same firm and across firms as well as wage fairness perceptions are found to be significant determinants of workers’ well-being. The overall findings suggest that equity and social status considerations as well as altruistic preferences towards co-workers and inequality aversion are more important than signal considerations in this context." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © Springer) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
How White Workers Navigate Racial Difference in the Workplace: Social-Emotional Processes and the Role of Workplace Racial Composition (2023)
Zitatform
Nelson, Jennifer L. & Tiffany D. Johnson (2023): How White Workers Navigate Racial Difference in the Workplace: Social-Emotional Processes and the Role of Workplace Racial Composition. In: Work and occupations online erschienen am 12.06.2023, S. 1-46. DOI:10.1177/07308884231176833
Abstract
"Research on racialized emotions and racialized organizations has begun to inform how we understand social interactions in the workplace and their implications for racial inequality. However, most research to date focuses on the experiences and coping strategies of racial minority workers, especially when confronted with instances of racial prejudice and discrimination. We extend research on racialized emotions in the workplace by mapping the stages of belonging/unbelonging white workers go through when they encounter instances of racial discomfort or perceived prejudice in the workplace. This is an important contribution to the study of race and work because existing research suggests the deleterious effects for people of color when white people experience negative emotions such as threat, fear, and anxiety in interracial encounters. Drawing on interview data with 56 white teachers in a metropolitan area in the U.S. Southeast, we document a process of racialized belonging. This is a process whereby white workers experienced varying degrees of surprise, confusion, frustration, and fear resulting from interracial—and some intraracial—experiences with coworkers as well as students. We note how the process is informed by racialized imprinting prior to workplace entry and followed by racialized emotions and racialized coping. Racial composition of the workplace also played a role, though the process looked similar across contexts. We argue that by accounting for white workers’ prior life experiences as well as organizations’ involvement in accommodating their emotional expectations, the way white workers behave when race becomes salient to them can be better understood and addressed." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Perceived Fairness and Consequences of Affirmative Action Policies (2023)
Schildberg-Hörisch, Hannah; Trieu, Chi; Willrodt, Jana; Schwarz, Marco A.;Zitatform
Schildberg-Hörisch, Hannah, Marco A. Schwarz, Chi Trieu & Jana Willrodt (2023): Perceived Fairness and Consequences of Affirmative Action Policies. In: The Economic Journal, Jg. 133, H. 656, S. 3099-3135. DOI:10.1093/ej/uead063
Abstract
"Debates about affirmative action often revolve around fairness. In a laboratory experiment, we study three quota rules in tournaments that favor individuals whose performance is low, either due to discrimination, low productivity, or choice of a short working time. Affirmative action favoring discriminated individuals is perceived as fairest, followed by that targeting individuals with a short working time, while favoring low-productivity individuals is not perceived as fairer than an absence of affirmative action. Higher fairness perceptions coincide with a higher willingness to compete and less retaliation against winners, underlining that fairness perceptions matter for the consequences of affirmative action." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
The perceived fair duration of unemployment benefits for older workers. The role of lifetime achievements in the labour market (2023)
Zitatform
Senghaas, Monika, Christopher Osiander, Gesine Stephan, Olaf Struck & Richard Wolff (2023): The perceived fair duration of unemployment benefits for older workers. The role of lifetime achievements in the labour market. In: International Journal of Social Welfare, Jg. 32, H. 2, S. 164-177., 2022-08-03. DOI:10.1111/ijsw.12558
Abstract
"The welfare state regulates social policies and reallocates scarce resources. For the social legitimacy of the welfare state, it is important that the public supports the principles underlying this reallocation. This article examines the impact of different activities during the life course on public deservingness perceptions of older unemployed people. In a factorial survey experiment conducted among a random sample of individuals drawn from German administrative employment records, we examine the maximum duration of benefit receipt which is perceived as fair for older unemployed persons with different biographies. The results indicate strong public support for a nexus between previous contributions and benefit entitlements. Besides financial contributions to unemployment insurance, parenting and further training are considered to be ‘lifetime achievements’ which justify longer unemployment benefit receipt. We interpret these findings as an expression of a generalised form of reciprocity which guides perceptions of deservingness regarding older unemployed persons." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © Wiley) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Measuring Unfair Inequality: Reconciling Equality of Opportunity and Freedom from Poverty (2022)
Zitatform
Hufe, Paul, Ravi Kanbur & Andreas Peichl (2022): Measuring Unfair Inequality: Reconciling Equality of Opportunity and Freedom from Poverty. In: The Review of Economic Studies, Jg. 89, H. 6, S. 3345-3380. DOI:10.1093/restud/rdab101
Abstract
"Empirical evidence on distributional preferences shows that people do not judge inequality as problematic per se but that they take into account the fairness or unfairness of the outcome. This article conceptualizes a view of unfair inequality and introduces a new measure of inequality based on two widely held fairness principles: equality of opportunity and freedom from poverty. It develops a method for decomposing inequality and its trends into an unfair and a fair component. We provide two empirical applications of our measure. First, we analyse the development of inequality in the US from 1969 to 2014 from a fairness perspective. Second, we conduct a corresponding international comparison between the US and 31 European countries in 2010. Our results document that unfair inequality matches the well-documented inequality growth in the US since 1980. This trend is driven by decreases in social mobility, i.e., increasing importance of parental education and occupation for the income of their children. Among the 32 countries of our international comparison, the land of opportunity ranks among the most unfair societies in 2010." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Are fairness perceptions shaped by income inequality? evidence from Latin America (2022)
Zitatform
Reyes, Germán & Leonardo Gasparini (2022): Are fairness perceptions shaped by income inequality? evidence from Latin America. In: Journal of Economic Inequality, Jg. 20, H. 4, S. 893-913. DOI:10.1007/s10888-022-09526-w
Abstract
"A common assumption in the literature is that the actual level of income inequality shapes individuals' beliefs about whether the income distribution is fair (“fairness views,” for short). However, individuals do not directly observe income inequality (which often leads to large misperceptions), nor do they consider all inequities to be unfair. In this paper, we empirically assess the link between objective measures of income inequality and fairness views in a context of high but decreasing income inequality. To do this, we combine opinion poll data with harmonized data from household surveys of 18 Latin American countries from 1997–2015. We find a strong and statistically significant relationship between income inequality and unfairness views across countries and over time. Unfairness views evolved in the same direction as income inequality for 17 out of the 18 countries in our sample. We find that individuals who are older, unemployed, and left-wing are, on average, more likely to perceive the income distribution as very unfair. Finally, we find that fairness views and income inequality have predictive power for individuals' self-reported propensity to mobilize and protest independent of each other, suggesting that these two variables capture different channels through which changes in the income distribution can affect social unrest." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © Springer-Verlag) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Fairness perceptions regarding in-work benefits: a survey experiment (2022)
Zitatform
Senghaas, Monika, Christopher Osiander, Gesine Stephan & Olaf Struck (2022): Fairness perceptions regarding in-work benefits: a survey experiment. In: The international journal of sociology and social policy, Jg. 42, H. 13/14, S. 30-49., 2022-06-14. DOI:10.1108/IJSSP-04-2022-0101
Abstract
"In many countries, individuals can receive welfare support whilst simultaneously being employed. The level of earned income that welfare recipients are allowed to keep has long been a subject of debate. Core issues include whether in-work benefit regulations provide incentives for individuals to expand labour market participation and are thus also socially effective and whether the population perceives welfare benefits for individuals who earn own income as fair. This article contributes to the debate about the social legitimacy of in-work benefit regulations by shedding light on the principles guiding judgements about an adequate amount of in-work benefit receipt. The authors use a factorial survey experiment to investigate which factors guide judgements about an adequate level of in-work benefit receipt. In the authors' factorial survey, the household composition, health status, and monthly earnings of a hypothetical in-work benefit recipient were varied experimentally. The study investigates Germany's basic income support programme, a means-tested social policy programme that targets both unemployed and employed individuals. The results show that respondents consider higher earnings retention rates for lower-income earners to be fair. This preference mirrors the German legislation, which is based on the principle of need. Furthermore, the presence of children and of physical as well as mental health impairments are associated with support for higher earnings retention rates. The findings suggest that citizens support the core features of in-work benefit regulations but do not consider in-work benefit recipients as a homogenous group when assessing the adequate level of benefit receipt." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © Emerald) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Der Einfluss von Geschlechterrollenbildern auf die Zuschreibung gerechter Einkommen: Ergebnisse eines Vignettenexperiments (2022)
Stadtmüller, Sven ; Klages, Annika; Beithan, Yasmin; Jakob, Melina; Ettel, Sophia; Amelong, Laura; Hirsch, Nils-David;Zitatform
Stadtmüller, Sven, Laura Amelong, Yasmin Beithan, Sophia Ettel, Nils-David Hirsch, Melina Jakob & Annika Klages (2022): Der Einfluss von Geschlechterrollenbildern auf die Zuschreibung gerechter Einkommen. Ergebnisse eines Vignettenexperiments. (SocArXiv papers), 31 S. DOI:10.31235/osf.io/bhmeu
Abstract
"Im Jahr 2021 verdienten erwerbstätige Frauen, auch unter Kontrolle einkommensrelevanter Merkmale, etwa sechs Prozent weniger als Männer. Dieser bereinigte Gender Pay Gap spiegelt eine Lohndiskriminierung von Frauen, deren Ursachen wissenschaftlich nicht gesichert sind. Der folgende Beitrag untersucht, inwieweit Geschlechterrollenbilder die Zuschreibung gerechter Einkommen beeinflussen. Dabei lautet unsere Hypothese, dass besonders Personen mit traditionellen Rollenbildern bei der Zuschreibung gerechter Einkommen nach dem Geschlecht diskriminieren. Zur Prüfung dieser Hypothese nutzen wir Daten einer zufallsbasierten Online-Befragung in der Stadt Frankfurt am Main (n=301). Zentraler Bestandteil der Befragung war ein sogenanntes Vignettenexperiment, in dem die Befragten gebeten wurden, das als gerecht empfundene Einkommen von sechs fiktiven, beschäftigten Personen anzugeben. Unsere Ergebnisse zeigen zwar für die Gesamtheit unserer Befragten keine Lohndiskriminierung von Frauen. Dennoch findet unsere Hypothese empirische Unterstützung: demnach sind es insbesondere Personen mit sehr traditionellen Geschlechterrollenbildern, die höhere Löhne für Männer als gerecht empfinden." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)
-
Literaturhinweis
Fairness of educational opportunities and income distribution: gender-sensitive analysis in a European comparative perspective (2022)
Zitatform
Stoilova, Rumiana & Petya Ilieva-Trychkova (2022): Fairness of educational opportunities and income distribution: gender-sensitive analysis in a European comparative perspective. In: The international journal of sociology and social policy, Jg. 43, H. 1/2, S. 272-291. DOI:10.1108/IJSSP-02-2022-0065
Abstract
"Purpose: The focus of this article is on gender justice with respect to opportunities (educational) and outcome (earnings). The main research question is whether educational opportunities are positively converted into fairness of income, and for whom and where this is the case. The importance of this study lies in the understanding that the subjective feeling of justice is a significant measure of quality of life, of the individual's subjective feeling of happiness and of the fulfilment of the goals people have reason to value. Design/methodology/approach The study takes a micro-macro approach, combining macro-level data taken from official statistics and micro-data from the 2018 European Social Survey for 25 European countries; the authors also apply multilevel modelling to the data analysis. Findings At individual level the authors found gender differences in the associations between education and fairness of educational opportunities. With regard to the scope of fairness, the authors emphasise that fairness of educational opportunities and net pay in European countries is less likely to be felt by someone who has a lower educational level. Higher educational expenditures are positively correlated with fairness of educational opportunities but not with fairness of net pay. Originality/value This article contributes to theoretical, empirical and policy-relevant gender justice research on the link between inequalities and justice perceptions. The authors have expanded the theoretical understanding of the concept of gender justice by taking into account the role of a specific gender norm on fairness perceptions. The norm, when asked about in a gender-neutral way, is not associated with fairness of pay, but when posed as a question specifically to women, has a negative relationship with perceptions of fair pay. The empirical contribution consists in the evaluation of individual and country mechanisms from a gender justice perspective. The policy contribution consists in questioning the belief that longer paid maternity leave is beneficial for women. In countries with long paid leave available to mothers, women reported even lower levels of fairness of net pay than men." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © Emerald) ((en))
-
Literaturhinweis
Bewusstsein, Ansprüche und der „Soziale Wert der Arbeitskraft“ (2022)
Voswinkel, Stephan;Zitatform
Voswinkel, Stephan (2022): Bewusstsein, Ansprüche und der „Soziale Wert der Arbeitskraft“. In: Arbeits- und industriesoziologische Studien, Jg. 15, H. 1, S. 40-53.
Abstract
"Das Bewusstsein der Arbeitenden resultiert aus einer Auseinandersetzung der Subjekte mit den Bedingungen ihrer sozialen Lage, mit ihren Identitätszuschreibungen und mit ihren Ressourcen, es verarbeitet also das Sein. Die Situation in der Arbeit ist eingebettet in den gesamten Lebenszusammenhang. Inwieweit hierin der Arbeit eine zentrale Rolle zukommt, ist eine empirische Frage und wird fassbar im Rahmen von Lebensorientierungen. Das Bewusstsein ist wesentlich normativ strukturiert, so dass Wertigkeits- und Anerkennungsmustern für das Bewusstsein eine zentrale Rolle zukommt. Der Bezug auf kulturelle Einbettungen und Anerkennungsverhältnisse existiert nicht neben den ökonomischen Verhältnissen und der Interessenorientierung, sondern beide sind miteinander verschränkt. Arbeitssoziologisch fasst der Beitrag dies mit der Kategorie des Sozialen Werts der Arbeitskraft, in der verschiedene Ungleichheitsdimensionen und kulturelle Dimensionen ökonomisch relevant werden." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)